summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/wiki/Chat_log/20161214-io-chatlog
blob: 7dec763310aab84a074c355bb72a90832a4a18c9 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
--- Log opened Wed Dec 14 08:57:55 2016
08:57 -!- wsa_ [~wsa@p54B33B2F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #periperi-io
08:57 -!- ServerMode/#periperi-io [+ns] by leguin.freenode.net
08:57 -!- Irssi: #periperi-io: Total of 1 nicks [1 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 0 normal]
08:57 -!- Irssi: Join to #periperi-io was synced in 0 secs
08:58 -!- geertu [~geert@d54C189FD.access.telenet.be] has joined #periperi-io
08:58 < geertu> Mornin'
08:58 -!- neg [~neg@unaffiliated/neg] has joined #periperi-io
08:59 <@wsa_> good morning
09:00 < neg> morning
09:02 <@wsa_> i think we convinced Eduardo to soc_device_match
09:02 < neg> yes :-)
09:03 < geertu> Good
09:03 < neg> I had a chat with Geert yesterday and I think I will switch to binary scaling instead of decimal scaling in next version to increase accuracy, I think it's better Renesas test that version then the deciaml one. Do you agree?
09:03 <@wsa_> yes, i do
09:03 <@wsa_> i wondered why it didn't work for you before
09:04 <@wsa_> On C64, we always do binary scaling ;)
09:04 < neg> it worked but the diff with the orignal algo which used deciaml scaling was greater so I stuck with the one which where closer to the orignal one
09:05 <@wsa_> it's a pity neither morimoto nor shimoda are here; i wanted to discuss testing this driver inside Renesas
09:05 < geertu> neg: it's strange the diff was greather. I can imagine it's greather for some specific values, but on average it should be smaller.
09:05 <@wsa_> neg: given that the precision is higher, this was "non-working" in my book :)
09:06 <@wsa_> it is also a pity that Ulrich is not here, I wonder about Geert's question, too
09:06 < geertu> Perhaps a silly programming error?
09:06 <@wsa_> "BTW, if DR already indicates timeout, what is the added value of TO?"
09:07  * geertu still has to review Uli's SCIF series
09:07 < geertu> The various "feature bits" on SCIF are a collection of wild ideas that came up through multiple brainstorm sessions?
09:08 <@wsa_> heh
09:09 <@wsa_> geertu: any news about the hotel in Brusseles for the pre-FOSDEM meetings?
09:09 < geertu> No, haven't booked anything yet.
09:09 < geertu> I'm trying to find out how many persons will attend ;-)
09:10 <@wsa_> I'll arrive on Thursday and leave on Monday
09:10 < geertu> For Core, we'll have Niklas, Jacopo, Simon, Laurent, and Me.
09:10 < geertu> No recent response from Magnus or Uli
09:11 < geertu> So that makes 5-7
09:11 < geertu> What about I/O?
09:11 <@wsa_> I recall that Magnus wanted to come?
09:12 < geertu> His current (last I heard from Morimoto-san) plan is to arrive on Fri at 16h
09:12 < geertu> ... which is in-time for the beer event, but nof the meeting, I guess ;-)
09:13 <@wsa_> well, from the last chat meeting, I know of:
09:13 <@wsa_> you, neg, simon, and me
09:13 <@wsa_> probably uli
09:13 <@wsa_> maybe
09:14 <@wsa_> didn't know about Jacopo but he is welcome of course
09:14 < geertu> So incl. J., that's also 5-7
09:14 <@wsa_> pretty much the same group :)
09:15 <@wsa_> i am likely interested in the core meeting as well
09:16 <@wsa_> we might have cross over tasks anyhow
09:16 <@wsa_> (TDSEL)
09:16 < geertu> ok, 6-8
09:16 <@wsa_> speaking of, what to do with the TDSEL patch for r8a7790?
09:17 < geertu> That's the one with the hardcoded register values? I don't think we can use it as-is.
09:19 < geertu> There doesn't seem to be a PIN_CONFIG_*  for capacitance in enum pin_config_param yet.
09:19 <@wsa_> well
09:19 <@wsa_> the docs don't really allow configuration
09:19 < geertu> (about the hardcoded values) Or don't we need explicit configuration, and should we also use the same value?
09:20 <@wsa_> yes
09:20 < geertu> The docs are conflicting.
09:20 <@wsa_> for H2, they say bits "should be 01"
09:20 <@wsa_> which is not the reset value
09:21 <@wsa_> it even says "must be 01"
09:21 < geertu> Isn't there another doc that says "must be 00"?
09:21 < geertu> While the HW engineers responded that it's the same hardware block everywhere.
09:23 <@wsa_> Yes, M2-W says "must be 00"
09:23 < geertu> If we don't need configuration, doing it in .init() is fine for me.
09:24 <@wsa_> That's a good item for the FOSDEM meeting:
09:25 <@wsa_> if somebody could bring a koelsch, then we could check if the same SDR104 problem with TDSEL=00 exists
09:25 <@wsa_> or any other Gen2 board
09:26 <@wsa_> okay, that was all the topics I had
09:26 <@wsa_> anything left from your side?
09:27 < neg> I have question is this BUG http://pastebin.com/wycYBEyF which can be triggerd on Koelsch by 'reboot' using shmobile_defconfig + CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP known?
09:27 < geertu> Is this card SDR-104? http://www.conrad.be/ce/nl/product/1388580/SanDisk-Ultra-SDHC-kaart-32-GB-Class-10-UHS-I
09:27 < geertu> "systemd-shutdow Not tainted"? Shouldn't systemd taint the system? ;-)
09:28 < geertu> I recently enabled CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP in my .config, but haven't seen that message on my Koelsch. Usually not using shmobile_defconfig, though.
09:28 < neg> I need to switch to init for my NFS, can't boot properly without CONFIG_CGROUPS and CONFIG_SECCOMP :-)
09:29 < neg> the BUG is triggerd by running reboot and hits all the time for me
09:30 <@wsa_> geertu: it should be. it has uhs-1 and i've never seen cards which only support SDR50 but not SDR104
09:30 <@wsa_> geertu: but shouldn't you play safe and go for micro-sd?
09:30 <@wsa_> I don't know about other Gen2 boards, but Lager has micro-sd only
09:30 < geertu> wsa_: OK. I used my Koelsch a few weeks ago to copy music to that card, to be used in my car.
09:31 <@wsa_> ah, you already have it
09:31 < geertu> Yes.
09:31 <@wsa_> well, the kernel log will tell you which mode was used
09:32 < geertu> I also have a similar smaller uSD card http://www.conrad.be/ce/nl/product/1381015/SanDisk-Ultra-16-GB-microSDHC-kaart-Class-10-UHS-I-incl-SD-adapter
09:32 < geertu> Also used koelsch to init that one ;-)
09:32 <@wsa_> and if the problem is the same, then you will get timeouts after a second or so after removing the card
09:32 < geertu> In SDHI0, of course (SDHI1 is slower)
09:33 <@wsa_> cool
09:33 <@wsa_> because it is only the san-disk card which causes the problem for me
09:33 < geertu> Lemme look in kern.log
09:33 <@wsa_> the samsung card works fine
09:33 <@wsa_> (mine is 64gb, though)
09:36 < geertu> mmc0: new ultra high speed SDR104 SDHC card at address 0007
09:37 < geertu> mmcblk0: mmc0:0007 SL32G 29.0 GiB 
09:37 < geertu> and in SDHI1:
09:37 < geertu> mmc1: new ultra high speed SDR50 SDHC card at address 0007
09:37 < geertu> mmcblk1: mmc1:0007 SL32G 29.0 GiB 
09:37 < geertu> The other one:
09:37 < geertu> mmc0: new ultra high speed SDR104 SDHC card at address aaaa
09:37 < geertu> mmcblk0: mmc0:aaaa SL16G 14.8 GiB 
09:38 < geertu> According to the log, I removed and reinserted the second one, and that worked
09:38 <@wsa_> nice to know
09:38 < geertu> If there's anything else I can test
09:39 <@wsa_> don't think so
09:39 <@wsa_> re-inserting is the test to do
09:39 < geertu> You need my TDSEL values?
09:40 <@wsa_> ah, yes
09:40 <@wsa_> i assumed they were 0, but there is firmware involved
09:43 < geertu> => md.l 0xe6060084 2
09:43 < geertu> e6060084: 00000000 00000000    ........
09:46 <@wsa_> ok
09:46 <@wsa_> thanks!
09:46 <@wsa_> i'll bring my "magic card" to Brussels nonetheless :)
09:46 < geertu> If you need anything else to be tested, the cards are in my car resp. NanoPi
09:48 <@wsa_> neg: this issue is known. i2c transactions want irqs but they are disabled already that late
09:49 <@wsa_> neg: this is why we have a task for 'irqless i2c communication' in the io todo
09:49 < neg> wsa_: ahh I see, good then I know :-)
09:49 -!- horms [~horms@217.111.208.18] has joined #periperi-io
09:50 <@wsa_> seems i should always mention in the invitation letter that we meet in #periperi-io
09:50 <@wsa_> sorry simon
09:51 < horms> No, the problem is entirely mine. I forgot to add the meeting to my schedule.
09:51 < horms> Appologies for missing the meeting
09:51 < neg> wsa_: could you in the report put a small remark that we would like Morimot-san or Khiem help to test the thermal driver?
09:52 <@wsa_> yes
09:52 <@wsa_> not only a small one :)
09:53 < neg> thanks :-)
09:54 <@wsa_> no prob, simon. i'll upload the log later today
09:54 <@wsa_> so, i have another appointment soon
09:54 <@wsa_> and i think we are done?
09:55 <@wsa_> i'll ask the remaining questions in the summary mail
09:55 <@wsa_> to uli and morimoto
09:55 <@wsa_> until then, have a nice week
09:56 < neg> I have nothing more, thanks all
09:58 <@wsa_> cya!
09:59 < geertu> thx, bye
--- Log closed Wed Dec 14 10:03:36 2016