diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'wiki/Chat_log/20190221-mm-chatlog')
| -rw-r--r-- | wiki/Chat_log/20190221-mm-chatlog | 202 |
1 files changed, 202 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/Chat_log/20190221-mm-chatlog b/wiki/Chat_log/20190221-mm-chatlog new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1c5af93 --- /dev/null +++ b/wiki/Chat_log/20190221-mm-chatlog @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ +Multimedia-chat-meeting-2019-02-21 + +10:17 < pinchartl> welcome to the multimedia meeting +10:18 < pinchartl> Topic 1. Status Check for the Multimedia Tasks +10:18 < pinchartl> * Jacopo +10:18 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:18 < pinchartl> - Take over the V4L2 multiplexed streams patch series +10:18 < pinchartl> Started addressing review comments and adding documentation. Plan to +10:18 < pinchartl> submit next week and implement data lane negotiation on top of that. +10:18 < pinchartl> - Investigated adv748x CSI-2 data lane configuration on AFE->TXA +10:18 < pinchartl> - Reviewed VIN and miscellaneous V4L2 patches +10:18 < pinchartl> - Attended FOSDEM and periBe meetings +10:18 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:18 < pinchartl> - Finalize the next version of the V4L2 multiplexed streams patch series +10:18 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None +10:18 < pinchartl> jmondi: any comment ? +10:19 < kbingham> jmondi, If you publish an updated/rebased mux branch - please let me know so that I can rebase my gmsl/for-renesas-drivers on top of it. +10:19 < pinchartl> we seem to be missing Jacopo +10:19 < pinchartl> * Kieran +10:19 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:19 < pinchartl> - PeriPeri meetings in Brussels +10:19 < pinchartl> - FOSDEM +10:19 < pinchartl> - Hans' VSP1 smatch testing +10:19 < pinchartl> - Various reviews +10:19 < pinchartl> - VSP partition algorithm phase investigations +10:19 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:19 < pinchartl> - Focus on VSP partition algorithm phase until complete +10:19 < pinchartl> - On holidays until the end of the week +10:19 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: +10:19 < pinchartl> - VSP partition algorithm phase is difficult to understand +10:19 < pinchartl> kbingham: any comment ? +10:20 < kbingham> No. +10:20 < pinchartl> thank you +10:20 < pinchartl> * Laurent +10:20 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:20 < pinchartl> - FOSDEM & multimedia meeting +10:20 < pinchartl> - DU writeback support for Gen3 +10:20 < pinchartl> A working patch series has been posted, but the upstream DRM community +10:20 < pinchartl> requested the DU driver to use the DRM/KMS writeback connector API +10:20 < pinchartl> instead of V4L2 for writeback capture. A new version is under +10:20 < pinchartl> development. +10:20 < pinchartl> - Upstreamed VSP test suite and related yavta patches +10:20 < pinchartl> - Upstreamed D3/R3 RGB output +10:20 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:20 < pinchartl> - DU writeback support +10:20 < pinchartl> - Finalize additional tasks for 2019 Q1 +10:20 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None +10:20 < pinchartl> any question ? +10:20 < morimoto> Thank you for Brussels souvenir +10:21 < morimoto> for all M/M member +10:21 < pinchartl> you're welcome :-) +10:21 < jmondi> I'm here sorry +10:21 < jmondi> got distracted :) no comments from here +10:21 < pinchartl> it was a bit more Finnish than Belgian, but we signed it all in Brussels :-) +10:21 < pinchartl> jmondi: thank you +10:21 < pinchartl> * Morimoto-san +10:21 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:21 < pinchartl> - ALSA SoC v5.0 bugfix for issues reported by users +10:21 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:21 < pinchartl> - ALSA SoC needs to be updated for modern device +10:21 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: +10:21 < pinchartl> - ALSA SoC work depends on a developer from Intel +10:21 < pinchartl> morimoto: any comment ? +10:21 < morimoto> No, thanks +10:22 < pinchartl> thank you +10:22 < pinchartl> who is that Intel person ? and is there something we can help to make him help you ? +10:23 < morimoto> He is Pierre-Louis Bossart +10:23 < morimoto> He is working for other Intel work. +10:23 < morimoto> And mine is depend to it +10:24 < pinchartl> is his work progressing ? that is, is it "just" a matter of waiting for him to complete his work, or is it stalled for some reason ? +10:24 < morimoto> I think he is working very hard. +10:25 < morimoto> And I need some prepare work for my task +10:25 < morimoto> so, both are under hard work +10:25 < morimoto> :) +10:25 < pinchartl> ok :-) +10:26 < pinchartl> * Niklas +10:26 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:26 < pinchartl> - [PATCH] rcar-vin: Fix lockdep warning at stream on +10:26 < pinchartl> - [PATCH] rcar-csi2: Use standby mode instead of resetting +10:26 < pinchartl> - [PATCH] rcar-csi2: Allow configuring of video standard +10:26 < pinchartl> - [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: r8a77990-ebisu: small fixes for VIN +10:26 < pinchartl> - [PATCH 0/3] rcar-csi2: Update start procedures to latest revision of datasheet +10:26 < pinchartl> - [PATCH] rcar-csi2: restart CSI-2 link if error is detected +10:26 < pinchartl> - Attended face-to-face periperi Multimedia meeting +10:26 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:26 < pinchartl> - Try to clean up the VIN crop and compose code +10:26 < pinchartl> This is needed to ease merging of UDS and PM support. +10:26 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: +10:26 < pinchartl> - Unsure how to upstream updates for periupport bsp392 +10:26 < pinchartl> Are we using periject or periupport to track upporting now? +10:26 < pinchartl> neg: any comment ? +10:27 < neg> No comment, thanks +10:27 < pinchartl> do you want to discuss how to handle upporting after the status update ? +10:28 < neg> Yes please +10:28 < pinchartl> ok +10:28 < pinchartl> thanks +10:28 < pinchartl> * Ulrich +10:28 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:28 < pinchartl> - Reviewed "rcar-csi2: Update start procedures to latest revision of +10:28 < pinchartl> datasheet" series +10:28 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: None +10:28 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None +10:28 < pinchartl> uli___: any comment ? +10:28 < uli___> nope +10:29 < pinchartl> thank you +10:29 < pinchartl> Topic 2. Discussions +10:29 < pinchartl> - BSP Upporting +10:29 < pinchartl> neg: please go ahead :-) +10:30 < neg> Thanks, I'm only unsure if we track upport progress in periupport or periject +10:31 < neg> In the past I sent patches to group leaders to periupport but after preparing such a patch recently I became unsure if we are 'live' with periject for this yet or not +10:31 < pinchartl> does anyone have an answer to that question ? wsa maybe ? +10:31 < kbingham> neg, Do we have multimedia tasks in periject yet? +10:34 < pinchartl> silence... +10:34 < Marex> morimoto: I sent you an IRC PM, did you receive it ? +10:34 < pinchartl> have we lost neg ? +10:34 < pinchartl> wsa: ping ? +10:35 < morimoto> Marex: sorry what is "PM" ? +10:35 < kbingham> Aha - we have a viewer starting :) (thanks morimoto-san) +10:35 < neg> kbingham: no, but there are upport tasks for IO, d5c115890a419f77 ("projects: add upport tasks from bsp392 for IO") +10:35 < Marex> morimoto: private message +10:35 < morimoto> Marex: I think no +10:35 < Marex> morimoto: OK, I can send you an email later, it's not important +10:35 < morimoto> kbingham: I'm creating HTML version now :) +10:36 < pinchartl> neg: Wolfram seems gone already, I fear we'll have to discuss it on the list +10:36 < kbingham> From what I can see - wsa has created IO tasks only. +10:36 < morimoto> Marex: OK +10:36 < wsa> what was the question? +10:36 < pinchartl> wsa: 10:31 < neg> In the past I sent patches to group leaders to periupport but after preparing such a patch recently I became unsure if we are 'live' with periject for this yet or not +10:37 < kbingham> morimoto, "./ject --oneline" Nice :) +10:37 < wsa> yes, sure I have created IO tasks only. Conversions needs manual updates and I can't do that for other groups +10:37 < wsa> What did you expect here? +10:38 < pinchartl> wsa: I certainly didn't expect you to handle the multimedia tasks :-) +10:38 < wsa> So, for IO, periject has gone live, but for me, we are still in beta-testing phase +10:38 < pinchartl> the question is whether we are live with periject +10:38 < wsa> pinchartl: thanks :) +10:38 < pinchartl> ok +10:38 * kbingham has a Hugo returning ... so I must leave. +10:38 < wsa> to answer neg's question: during beta-test, both is fine for me +10:39 < pinchartl> so you would say it can be a per-group decision at this time ? +10:39 < pinchartl> ok +10:39 < pinchartl> neg: what's your preference ? do you want to beta-test periject for multimedia ? :-) +10:39 < wsa> I will ensure both are in sync, and we will find out what is best +10:39 < neg> I think the confusion answers my question for MM, I will send out the patch to periupport :-) +10:39 < wsa> pinchartl: I wished everyone would go live with periject. Dunno why this has not happened yet. +10:40 < kbingham> wsa, lack of understanding I expect. +10:40 < kbingham> I think we should move to it asap. +10:41 < wsa> Okay, in case you just need someone to tell you to do it... +10:41 < wsa> Do it! +10:41 < wsa> :D +10:41 < pinchartl> neg: I agree with Wolfram, I think it would be nice if we all moved to it +10:41 < kbingham> wsa, Excellent ^ you just did :) +10:41 < pinchartl> so I'd favour using periject instead of sending patches for periupport +10:41 * kbingham really has to leave now +10:43 < Marex> morimoto: I was just curious whether it's a great idea to drop by at the end of march to see the sakura blooms and whether they're beautiful in Tokyo :) +10:44 < pinchartl> neg: ? +10:44 < neg> I'm OK with periject but keeping the two projects in sync if manual steps is involved scares me +10:45 < morimoto> March: According to web, 2019 sakura in Tokyo is from 23th March +10:45 < Marex> morimoto: jupp +10:45 < pinchartl> neg: let's go for periject only then +10:45 < neg> Sorry got lost in the periject code, it seems periject does not yet have the same feature set as periject when it comes to track upport data. Looking at wsa commits 'normal tasks are created to group sets of upport commits +10:45 < morimoto> Thank you periupport, welcome periject +10:48 < neg> So to switch to periject all MM related patches from bsp392 needs to be extracted and grouped for periject, which is fine but a task someone needs to do +10:48 < morimoto> Marex: This is Japanese page, but for 2019 sakura +10:48 < morimoto> https://jp.zekkeijapan.com/article/index/493/ +10:48 < Marex> morimoto: I need to practice anyway ! +10:48 < pinchartl> neg: Wolfram developed a script to classify commits. we can then manually edit the tasks +10:48 < Marex> morimoto: I am slowly starting to be able to make sense from emails between you and Hosoya-san :) +10:48 < pinchartl> neg: I can help you with that +10:49 < morimoto> Marex: Thanks. But no stress +10:49 < pinchartl> neg: would you be ok working on it with me ? +10:50 < Marex> morimoto: thank you for translating them for me :) +10:50 < neg> pinchartl: absolutely +10:50 < pinchartl> thank you +10:50 < pinchartl> let's do it then +10:50 < pinchartl> any other discussion topic ? +10:51 < neg> not from me +10:51 < wsa> pinchartl: note that the unique-key topic is still open for periject +10:51 < Marex> morimoto: btw there's an updated forecast from Feb. 7th, https://www.jnto.go.jp/sakura/eng/index.php , I think there should be new one on 21st too +10:51 < jmondi> not from here +10:51 < morimoto> Not from me. Just information, I will enjoy snowboard from tomorrow ;P +10:51 < pinchartl> wsa: I know. I'll see if I can have a look at that +10:52 < wsa> cool +10:52 < pinchartl> morimoto: nice ! :-) +10:52 < jmondi> morimoto: now we're jealous +10:52 < wsa> morimoto: have fun! +10:52 < pinchartl> Topic 3. Additional Tasks for 2019 Q1 +10:52 < pinchartl> The following additional tasks will be submitted to Renesas today: +10:52 < pinchartl> - DU External Pixel Clock Routing Support +10:52 * jmondi learns there is a calendar for Japanese cherry blossom season +10:52 < pinchartl> - DU LVDS Dual Link Support Prototype +10:52 < morimoto> pinchartl: jmondi: wsa: thanks ! +10:52 < pinchartl> if anyone wants another AT for Q1, please chime in today +10:53 < wsa> jmondi: it is part of the weather forecast in Japanese TV :) +10:53 < pinchartl> that's it for today +10:53 < pinchartl> next meeting two weeks from now on March the 7th ? +10:53 < wsa> ack +10:53 < neg> works for me +10:54 < pinchartl> I propose adjourning this meeting. does anyone second ? +10:54 < neg> second +10:54 < morimoto> 2nd +10:54 < jmondi> yup +10:55 < pinchartl> meeting adjourned. thank you all for attending, and have a nice day |