diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'wiki/Chat_log/20161025-mm-chatlog')
| -rw-r--r-- | wiki/Chat_log/20161025-mm-chatlog | 175 |
1 files changed, 175 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/Chat_log/20161025-mm-chatlog b/wiki/Chat_log/20161025-mm-chatlog new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8013ba4 --- /dev/null +++ b/wiki/Chat_log/20161025-mm-chatlog @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ +Multimedia-chat-meeting-2016-10-25 + +<pinchartl> hello [15:50] +<neg> hi all, everyone made it back from Berlin in one piece? +<morimoto> hi +<uli___> hello +* geertu did [15:51] +<pinchartl> I haven't counted the pieces +<pinchartl> we're missing Magnus and Kieran [15:52] +<kbingham> morning +* kbingham appears from a cloud like magic :D +* uli___ hides under the desk [15:53] +<pinchartl> we're not missing Kieran :-) +<pinchartl> let's wait a few minutes for Magnus +* kbingham thought this meeting was tomorrow :D +<pinchartl> didn't you receive the invite ? +<morimoto> 1 question during waiting. How to do above "* kbingham xxx" on IRC + ? [15:54] +<geertu> morimoto: /me xxx +<morimoto> OK, let's use it +* morimoto hoge +<morimoto> Ohh !! +<kbingham> Yes, - it was in my calendar - hence I'm here. Just had it stuck in + my head that meetings were on a wednesday for some reason. + [15:55] +<pinchartl> morimoto: you're now an IRC master :-) +* kbingham applauds +<neg> I wonder who tought of that feature and what the rational was for + implementing it, MUD:s over IRC ? :-) [15:57] +<pinchartl> looks like Magnus won't make it, let's get started +<pinchartl> topics for today +<pinchartl> - Status check for the multimedia tasks +<pinchartl> - Additional tasks for Q4/2 2016 +<pinchartl> - Next meeting +<pinchartl> anything else ? +<morimoto> I posted 2 questions to you guys [15:58] +<pinchartl> I've just seen that [15:59] +<pinchartl> let's address them as part of the status report +<morimoto> thanks +<pinchartl> Topic 1. Status check for the multimedia tasks [16:00] +<pinchartl> the alphabetical order points to... Kieran! +<pinchartl> Since last meeting: +* kbingham would like reverse alphabetical status checks this week :D +<pinchartl> For the next two weeks: +<pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: +<pinchartl> request granted +<pinchartl> uli___: you're first :-) +<uli___> what a ripoff! [16:01] +<uli___> anyway +<uli___> since last time: sent v2 of the VIN series for lager/koelsch/gose +<uli___> for the next two weeks: prepare HDMI out gen3 for upstream, and/or +<uli___> audio loopback test tool [16:02] +<uli___> dunno which i will do first +<pinchartl> regarding the VIN series, have you seen my latest comment about + the adv7180 DT bindings ? +<uli___> yes, i have +<uli___> no blockers i'm aware of +<pinchartl> do you plan to work on a v3 ? [16:03] +<uli___> i do, though i don't know if that will be within the next two weeks +<uli___> that's it from me [16:04] +<pinchartl> unless there's something I'm missing, it's "just" a matter of + updating the DT bindings and the DT. an agreement has been reached + at least with Hans regarding how the DT bindings should look like +<pinchartl> so I'd advise starting early for the bindings part, as it usually + takes time to go through review +<uli___> ok, i'll take that into account [16:05] +<pinchartl> thanks [16:06] +<pinchartl> next, neg +<neg> A) Started to rewrtie the VIN Gen3 driver to use media control instead + of s_input. MC part is done now the rest of the driver just needs to use + it. Rewrite is the reason the old VIN patches was not resent like I + talked about last IRC multimedia meeting. +<neg> B) Finish the VIN Gen3 MC rewrite. +<neg> C) None. +<neg> On a side not I'm much happier with a MC implementation than s_input, + lets see how it do in review :-) [16:07] +<neg> EOT [16:08] +<pinchartl> will you attend the IRC meeting on #v4l at 11:30 UTC regarding + v4l2_async ? +<neg> yes +<pinchartl> great, thanks [16:09] +<pinchartl> next, Morimoto-san +<morimoto> A) +<morimoto> I posted ALSA SoC cleanup patch, It is under reviewing. +<morimoto> I posted OF graph base sound card patchset to ALSA / DT ML, +<morimoto> I got comment from Rob, and discussed, but no return from him. +<morimoto> I'm considering BSP sound issue. +<morimoto> B) +<morimoto> continue ALSA SoC cleanup patch +<morimoto> Wait Rob's comment for OF graph patch [16:10] +<morimoto> C) +<morimoto> No response from Rob +<morimoto> EOT +<pinchartl> thank you [16:11] +<morimoto> A+) I posted Sound IOMMU support patch, too +<pinchartl> by considering BSP sound issue, do you mean you're investigating + it ? +<morimoto> We already know the issue, but we don't know how to solve it :( + [16:12] +<morimoto> It is not good match to ALSA SoC style +<pinchartl> ok +<pinchartl> so you're trying to see how it could be solved in the BSP without + having to rewrite everything ? [16:13] +<morimoto> BSP issue is very Salvator-X specific issue at this point +<morimoto> Maybe BSP team will try local-patch 1st [16:14] +<pinchartl> ok, thanks [16:15] +<pinchartl> next, me +<pinchartl> since last meeting, I've reworked the DU encoder and connector + initialization to use the DRM bridge framework [16:16] +<pinchartl> the Du driver doesn't hardcode encoder compatible strings anymore +<pinchartl> only the internal LVDS encoder is still implemented without DRM + bridge, I might change that at a later point [16:17] +<pinchartl> this change will impact HDMI support on Gen3, it should hopefully + make it easier +<pinchartl> I've also been through the BSP multimedia patches to see what we + need to upport, and upported a few of the simple ones [16:18] +<pinchartl> I'll post them later today or tomorrow +<pinchartl> until the next meeting I plan to follow up on the LVDS mode + selection patches +<pinchartl> I'm waiting for a reply from Rob Herring, I'll ping him +<pinchartl> I also plan to post a proposal for the rotation and histogram + APIs, I haven't had time to address it yet [16:19] +<pinchartl> and, last but not least, I'll attend the kernel summit and the + linux plumbers conference next week, so I'll have reduced + availabilities [16:20] +<pinchartl> (and will be in a different time zone) +<pinchartl> I'll take off tomorrow +<pinchartl> and I forgot to mention that I've also posted M3-W DU patches +<pinchartl> now, regarding Morimoto-san's question +<morimoto> OK [16:21] +<pinchartl> "VSP,?,plan,laurent,Fix suspend/resume crash" +<pinchartl> this will likely be fixed by Kieran as an additional task for the + second half of Q4 +<morimoto> Q4 = 12/M ? +<pinchartl> "likely" because the SoW is still a draft +<pinchartl> yes, 12/M +<morimoto> OK, sounds nice [16:22] +<pinchartl> assuming the task gets accepted +<pinchartl> Magnus told me it had been selected, so there's a high chance it + will be formally accepted +* morimoto d(^-^)b +<morimoto> Last question is that kbingham's 2nd fixup patch for race condition + [16:23] +<morimoto> kbingham said that he will post it soon in Berlin +<kbingham> Ahh - I haven't had chance to finish that investigation yet. +<morimoto> BSP team want to test it +<pinchartl> good transition, let's move to Kieran :-) +* kbingham adds to task list +<kbingham> Since last meeting: VSP1 write-back worked on - but currently + capturing *partial* frames (see blockers in a moment) and also + worked on VSP1 partition algorithm performance task [16:25] +<morimoto> pinchartl: can you please add it on multimedia/todo file ? +<morimoto> otherwise, I will forget :P [16:26] +<kbingham> For the next two weeks - I *want* to see both of those completed, + and I've also picked up a FDP1 hang on G2 to look at, and I've just + added the 2nd race condition to my list. +<pinchartl> morimoto: sure +<pinchartl> the FDP1 hang on Gen2 is very low priority at this moment +<pinchartl> please only address it if you have nothing else to do [16:27] +<kbingham> Blockers.: Writeback output has chunks missing in the middle. I get + variable outputs, which is confusing - so I plan to mail Koji for + his advice again. +<pinchartl> which seems a bit unlikely to me :-) +<kbingham> ack on the FDP1 hang. +<kbingham> (above mailed in bulletpoints for copy/paste) +<kbingham> morimoto: Did the BSP team report on if the first patch solved + their existing race/hang? [16:28] +<morimoto> I didn't ask them. Let's ask +<pinchartl> morimoto: we believe that the first patch should solve the race + they reported [16:29] +<pinchartl> the second patch still needs more investigation +<morimoto> OK, thanks +<morimoto> I will report this to BSP team +<pinchartl> thanks +<pinchartl> that's it for the first topic [16:30] |