diff options
author | Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> | 2019-12-09 15:29:52 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> | 2019-12-09 16:23:07 +0900 |
commit | 55e3b2f45880faaf06f3c660ca9e8a6d9aa14bce (patch) | |
tree | 6392fd201a51ff0f6dc0e474803e6f3b20919504 /wiki/Chat_log/20190822-mm-chatlog | |
parent | 5d9e1b983faf7645ddc3d45d28e612d2ac4179c0 (diff) |
wiki: Porting wiki: Porting Chat Log
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'wiki/Chat_log/20190822-mm-chatlog')
-rw-r--r-- | wiki/Chat_log/20190822-mm-chatlog | 179 |
1 files changed, 179 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/Chat_log/20190822-mm-chatlog b/wiki/Chat_log/20190822-mm-chatlog new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cd1fc48 --- /dev/null +++ b/wiki/Chat_log/20190822-mm-chatlog @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +Multimedia-chat-meeting-2019-08-22 + +10:25 < pinchartl> welcome to the multimedia meeting +10:25 < pinchartl> Topic 1. Status Check for the Multimedia Tasks +10:25 < pinchartl> * Jacopo +10:25 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:25 < pinchartl> - Tested HDMI audio support on Salvator-XS M3-N +10:25 < pinchartl> - Resumed CMM upstream work +10:25 < pinchartl> - Broke and fixed my NFS setup +10:25 < pinchartl> - Small patches review on linux-media +10:25 < pinchartl> - Periject task update +10:25 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:25 < pinchartl> - Re-send CMM support +10:25 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None +10:25 < pinchartl> jaany comment ? +10:26 < pinchartl> no, not ja +10:26 < morimoto> jmondi: thank you for HDMI sound testing ! +10:26 < jmondi> ahem +10:26 < pinchartl> jmondi: any comment ? :-) +10:26 < jmondi> no comments, but nice name, thanks +10:26 < jmondi> morimoto: you're welcome! +10:27 < jmondi> pinchartl geertu uli_ thanks for CMM comments, I'll resubmit a new version soon +10:27 < pinchartl> thank you +10:27 < pinchartl> * Kieran +10:27 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:27 < pinchartl> - GMSL review (Add MAX9286 driver with single camera support) +10:27 < pinchartl> - Summer holiday +10:27 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:27 < pinchartl> - Summer holiday +10:27 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None +10:28 < pinchartl> (kbingham is excused) +10:28 < pinchartl> * Morimoto-san +10:28 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:28 < pinchartl> - ALSA SoC framework cleanup +10:28 < pinchartl> Posting more patches (in small batches) and resending pending patches. +10:28 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:28 < pinchartl> - Continue progressing cleanup patches +10:28 < pinchartl> More than 200 patches to be posted. +10:28 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: +10:28 < pinchartl> - Large number of cleanup patches to upstream +10:28 < pinchartl> The cleanup patches are not complex from a technical point of view, but +10:28 < pinchartl> given the large quantity review, and thus merging, is slow. +10:28 < pinchartl> morimoto: any comment ? +10:29 < morimoto> no comment, thanks +10:29 < pinchartl> regarding the review speed and the large number of patches, I haven't checked the patches themselves, but maybe it would be possible to squash some of them together if they're small and related to the same topic ? +10:30 < pinchartl> for instance, does ALSA require one patch per driver when you refactor APIs ? (or maybe your patches are already squashed and you just have a very large number of changes) +10:30 < morimoto> Yeah, but current patches are for framework, not for driver. +10:31 < morimoto> Thank you for your advice +10:31 < morimoto> too many very small cleanup patches :) +10:32 < pinchartl> ok :-) +10:32 < pinchartl> good luck then, or as we say in Finnish, tsemppiƤ ! +10:32 < morimoto> Thanks :) +10:33 < pinchartl> * Laurent +10:33 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:33 < pinchartl> - Sent pull requests for v5.3 fixes and v5.4 +10:33 < pinchartl> - FCP version read at probe time +10:33 < pinchartl> - CMM & VI patch review +10:33 < pinchartl> - Assisted Fabrizio with LVDS dual link support for r8a774c0-ek874.dts +10:33 < pinchartl> - DRM bridge API refactoring work with Boris Brezillon +10:33 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:33 < pinchartl> - DU group refactoring +10:33 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None +10:33 < pinchartl> (I had forgotten myself in alphabetical order) +10:33 < pinchartl> and I also forgot in the tasks since last meeting +10:34 < pinchartl> - Investigated HDMI output issues on Lager +10:34 < pinchartl> any question ? +10:34 < jmondi> are the DU group refactoring patches out? +10:34 < jmondi> should I take them into account for CMM ? +10:35 < pinchartl> let me check +10:36 < jmondi> thanks +10:36 < pinchartl> [PATCH v3 00/10] drm: rcar-du: Rework CRTC and groups for atomic commits +10:36 < pinchartl> I'd appreciate if you could take a look to at least be aware of what's going on +10:36 < pinchartl> but I think it's too early to rebase on top of that +10:38 < jmondi> pinchartl: sure +10:38 < jmondi> I'll have a look indeed +10:38 < pinchartl> thank you +10:38 < pinchartl> * Niklas +10:38 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:38 < pinchartl> - [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: rcar-{csi2,vin}: Rename bindings documentation files +10:38 < pinchartl> - [PATCH v2 0/6] rcar-vin: Add support for V4L2_FIELD_ALTERNATE +10:38 < pinchartl> - [PATCH] rcar-vin: Report correct image stride +10:38 < pinchartl> - [PATCH 0/2] max9286: Add MAX9286 driver with single camera support +10:38 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:38 < pinchartl> - Keep cleaning up VIN and get out-of-tree patches merged. +10:38 < pinchartl> - Keep pushing for a GMSL progress. +10:38 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None +10:39 < pinchartl> (neg is excused, he's loading a moving truck) +10:39 < pinchartl> * Simon + Kaneko-san +10:39 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:39 < pinchartl> - [PATCH] dt-bindings: sh-mobile-ceu: Rename bindings documentation file +10:39 < pinchartl> Will drop the bindings instead as the driver was removed. +10:39 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:39 < pinchartl> - Continue bindings documentation filename cleanup +10:39 < pinchartl> - Follow up on BSP patch triage with Laurent +10:39 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None +10:39 < pinchartl> horms: any comment ? +10:39 < pinchartl> how would you like to proceed for the BSP patch triage follow up ? +10:39 < horms> We could chat here, perhaps after this meeting. Or just continue the email thread. +10:40 < horms> No other comment :) +10:41 < pinchartl> I'm available this afternoon but not right after this meeting I'm afraid +10:41 < pinchartl> would you be able to summarize the status by e-mail ? we can then discuss it on IRC if needed +10:41 < jmondi> horms: pinchartl please keep me in the loop for ebisu upporting as I have the board if you need testing/support +10:42 < jmondi> specifically on the puzzling: "d3394635755093f8539acfdbaf932a164ec59533 # arm64: dts: 8a77990-ebisu: Enable simultaneous output of VGA and HDMI" +10:42 < horms> pinchartl: my email from yesterday does sumarise the status from my pov +10:42 < horms> jmondi: sure will do +10:43 < jmondi> horms: thanks, do you have the board ? +10:43 < horms> Yes :) +10:43 < pinchartl> horms: ok, I'll reply to the e-mail this afternoon, and if needed will ping you on IRC +10:44 < pinchartl> thank you +10:44 < horms> pinchartl: thanks, good plan +10:44 < jmondi> great, just let me know then if you need any support in testing +10:44 < pinchartl> * Ulrich +10:44 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: None +10:44 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: None +10:44 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None +10:44 < pinchartl> uli_: is that correct ? +10:44 < uli_> yes +10:44 < horms> jmondi: my main problem with thesting that is getting some cables. And a test scenario +10:44 < pinchartl> thank you +10:45 < pinchartl> any other question or comment for the multimedia meeting, or any discussion topic ? +10:45 < morimoto> I have 1 +10:46 < jmondi> pinchartl: I have a small one too +10:46 < pinchartl> morimoto: please go ahead +10:46 < morimoto> thanks :) +10:46 < jmondi> horms: I do have cables, but to test simulatanous output I was wondering as well how to do so.. I toyed myself with the idea that we need to write a test to add to the du-test suite to do so +10:47 < morimoto> I had asked about 8ch camera rebase for v4.x base kernel at OSS-J. +10:47 < morimoto> "rebase" request became fake, but I believe "upstream" request is still alive. +10:47 < morimoto> But, is this correct ? +10:47 < morimoto> It is not super rush, but BSP team want to use it as upstream base. +10:47 < horms> jmondi: perhaps we can chat offline about that part +10:48 < jmondi> horms: yes, ping me whenever +10:48 < pinchartl> morimoto: yes, we dropped the rebase (after unfortunately spending some time on it) but will continue with upstream development +10:48 < pinchartl> I believe Niklas has sent a development plan proposal, right ? +10:48 < morimoto> Yes +10:48 < morimoto> OK, thanks +10:49 < morimoto> I guess it takes long term ? +10:49 < pinchartl> it won't be done tomorrow :-) but I want to focus our efforts on it. very short term I would like to get pending patches merged for DU and CMM, but apart from that I want to focus on GMSL +10:50 < morimoto> Ohh, not tomorrow orz +10:50 < morimoto> joke ;) +10:50 < jmondi> morimoto: :) +10:50 < morimoto> OK, thanks +10:50 < morimoto> that's all from me. thanks +10:50 < jmondi> morimoto: any feedback on the proposed plan, and on the anticipated interest for rdacm21 +10:50 < jmondi> ? +10:51 < morimoto> they want to use rdacm21 camera, thanks +10:52 < morimoto> No big feedback. +10:52 < morimoto> They are worry about upstream base 8ch camera. +10:52 < morimoto> because they are using old kernel base 8ch camera (= soc-camera) +10:53 < morimoto> and they need to update kernel version. +10:53 < jmondi> and we killed soc-camera in newer kernel, I see +10:53 < morimoto> jmondi: yes, it is the reason. +10:53 < jmondi> well, the fact they want to use rdacm21 is a feedback already +10:55 < pinchartl> thank you +10:55 < pinchartl> jmondi: you had a question too ? +10:55 < jmondi> let's keep pushing to have the max9286 driver merged then! thanks +10:55 < jmondi> yes, small one +10:55 < jmondi> I sent a periject patch to track CMM work +10:55 < jmondi> who collects them ? (I know the question has been asked multiple times already) +10:56 < morimoto> good question :) +10:56 < jmondi> :) +10:56 < morimoto> I think all member can push, but I don't know the rule +10:56 < pinchartl> I don't plan to collect them, so from my point of view you should push it :-) +10:57 < morimoto> after review ? or without posting to ML ? +10:57 < pinchartl> after review +10:58 < morimoto> OK, good to know +10:58 < pinchartl> I think they should be posted to the mailing list so that everybody can see what is happening +10:58 < morimoto> push it after getting leader's Ack is more nice +10:58 < pinchartl> I'll try to ack them +10:58 < pinchartl> but if there's no review feedback within a few days, I think the changes can be pushed +10:59 < jmondi> fine then +10:59 < jmondi> I'll wait for an ack for a few more days... now that you know the patch is there, could you have a brief look ? +10:59 < jmondi> pinchartl: ^ +10:59 < jmondi> that's ll from me! +11:01 < pinchartl> jmondi: done +11:01 < pinchartl> any other question or discussion topic ? +11:01 < morimoto> nothing from me ! +11:03 < pinchartl> then this meeting is adjourned +11:03 < pinchartl> thank you everybody for attending +11:03 < pinchartl> and have a nice day |