wiki: Porting wiki: Porting Chat Log

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/wiki/Chat_log/20190523-core-chatlog b/wiki/Chat_log/20190523-core-chatlog
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b7b5ef1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wiki/Chat_log/20190523-core-chatlog
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+09:32 < geertu> Welcome to today's Core Group Chat!
+09:32 < geertu> Agenda:
+09:32 < geertu> 1. Status Updates
+09:32 < geertu> 2. Discussion Topics
+09:32 < geertu> Topic 1. Status updates
+09:32 < geertu> A) What have we done since last time:
+09:32 < geertu> Marek worked on U-Boot (SH2/SH3 and some SH4 removal), R-Car Gen3 PCIe,
+09:32 < geertu> SDHI HS400 upporting, DRAM size/layout handling), ATF (M3-W QoS
+09:32 < geertu> upporting and R-Car Gen3 multi-console API conversion), and OpenOCD (SH
+09:32 < geertu> QSPI).
+09:32 < geertu> Niklas tested PFC patches.
+09:32 < geertu> Shimoda-san supported Marek with automated reflashing, and reviewed
+09:32 < geertu> IPMMU suspend/resume patches.
+09:32 < geertu> Simon reposted R-Car Gen3 CMT bindings updates and unused sudmac
+09:32 < geertu> removal.
+09:32 < geertu> Geert posted PFC rework for pins without GPIO function, investigatd and
+09:32 < geertu> reported merge window regressions, and updated peri* for v5.2-rc1.
+09:33 < geertu> B) What we plan to do till next time:
+09:33 < geertu> Marek is considering adding remoteproc support to U-Boot for starting
+09:33 < geertu> the SH core on R-Car Gen2.
+09:33 < geertu> Shimoda-san plans to continue support Marek with automated reflashing.
+09:34 < geertu> C) Problems we have currently:
+09:34 < geertu> Morimoto-san sees too many warning when compiling v5.2-rc1 with gcc
+09:34 < geertu> 8.1.0.
+09:34 < geertu> eot
+09:34 < geertu> Anything I missed?
+09:35 < geertu> Topic 2. Discussion Topics
+09:35 < morimoto> kbingham: I'm afraid I'm using Japanese-English
+09:35 < kbingham> morimoto, That's better than american-english
+09:35 < morimoto> :)
+09:35 < Marex> morimoto: -いぜ　or -いせ ? :)
+09:35 < geertu> Looks like things were a bit quiter than usual, probably due to the merge window
+09:37 < geertu> Anything to discuss?
+09:37 < morimoto> Marex: about SH2/SH3, can you show me the posted mail some how ?
+09:37 < morimoto> URL is better
+09:38 < Marex> morimoto: one moment
+09:38 < morimoto> thx
+09:39 < Marex> morimoto: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1098321/ and related 12 patches
+09:39 < Marex> morimoto: I also sent http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1101769/ and related 6 patches , but didn't apply it yet
+09:40 < morimoto> thanks a lot !!
+09:40 < Marex> morimoto: you're welcome
+09:41 < Marex> morimoto: is there any board you want me to bring back ?
+09:42 < morimoto> nothing, thanks
+09:42 < shimoda> Marex: oh, I didn't realized the patches because my email address is inccorect :) s/shimoda.yoshihiro.uh/yoshihiro.shimoda.uh/
+09:42 < geertu> Marex: migo-r, rts7751r2, ecovec24??
+09:43 < morimoto> migo-r, ecovec24 are SH4, if my mermory was correct
+09:43 < Marex> shimoda: I pulled that address from the sources, seems someone wrote it the japanese way and swapped name/surname
+09:43 < Marex> shimoda: thank you for the heads up, I'll double-check next time I CC you
+09:44 < geertu> morimoto: right, you were askign about sh2/sh3. sorry
+09:44 < morimoto> geertu: no problem
+09:44 < Marex> I am keeping some SH4s around and planning to eventually use R-Car Gen2 SHX4 core to keep the SH support in U-Boot
+09:45 < shimoda> geertu: by the way, about the warning from Morimoto-san, what do you think? my suggestion seems to fix the warning
+09:46 < geertu> shimoda: I expect Arnd to have sent a fix for that already
+09:47 < geertu> (but I haven't checked)
+09:47 < morimoto> geertu: thanks ! nice to know
+09:47 < morimoto> geertu: Do you know the patch title ?
+09:48 < geertu> morimoto: No, I only assume he has posted a patch
+09:48 < morimoto> OK, thanks
+09:49 < geertu> as he typically fixes all such warnings in arm code
+09:50 < shimoda> geertu: i see. but, i don't find such a patch. so, should i send such a patch with RFC?
+09:52 < geertu> shimoda: Yes, please do so. It looks like a genuine bug
+09:52 < geertu> no one ever noticed before
+09:52 < shimoda> geertu: i got it. thanks!
+09:52 < geertu> Fixes: 34b8ab091f9ef57a ("bpf, arm64: use more scalable stadd over ldxr / stxr loop in xadd")
+09:53 < shimoda> geertu: thanks for suggested the Fixes tag!
+09:55 < geertu> Anything else to discuss?
+09:55 < geertu> Next meeting on Thursday, June 6?
+09:56 < geertu> wsa: pinchartl ^
+09:56 < wsa> ack
+09:56 < pinchartl> geertu: works for me
+09:57 < morimoto> geertu: OK for me
+09:58 < geertu> OK
+09:58 < geertu> So thanks for joining, and have a nice continued day!