projects: linux: io: updates up to W15

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

2 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/projects/linux/io/done/SDHI-HW-busy-timeout.yaml b/projects/linux/io/done/SDHI-HW-busy-timeout.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b4a7ded
--- /dev/null
+++ b/projects/linux/io/done/SDHI-HW-busy-timeout.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+title: SDHI; implement support for HW busy timeout
+team: IO
+assignee: Wolfram
+key: e2c455e0-1210-11ea-8389-b359bc6084c5
+status: Done
+
+upstream:
+  - torvalds: 35cdcd1268f654f55e2308767349c44bd25d8009 # mmc: tmio: Add data timeout error detection
+  - torvalds: ed2fab9a8229cc70fe03032e48d0ec375df6013e # mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add a condition of cmd/data timeout for retune
+  - next: 87e985aea2bef73242cf2a7d2ef81f950d677361 # mmc: renesas_sdhi: enable WAIT_WHILE_BUSY
+
+comments:
+  - "currently we use a tasklet to detect busy timeouts"
+  - "MMC maintainer says this is OKish, but HW timeout would be much better"
+  - "this is all for supporting MMC_CAP_ERASE properly"
+  - "MMC_CAP_ERASE has been removed meanwhile, and we set max_busy_timeout, too"
+  - "we still should care about handling when data timeouts happen"
+  - "RFT v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=388391&state=*"
+  - "RFT v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=388435&state=*"
+  - "needs some refactoring"
+  - "refactored v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=391145&state=*"
+  - "refactored series with max_busy_timeout merged"
+  - "prototype patches for handling data timeout developed by Shimoda-san and reviewed by Wolfram"
+  - "WAIT_WHILE_BUSY needs to be enabled on top of 'data timeout' patches"
+  - "data timeout series v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=405671&state=*"
+  - "v1 merged"
+  - "patch to enable WAIT_WHILE_BUSY sent internally for further testing"
+  - "v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20210408133420.2900-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/"
+  - "merged"
diff --git a/projects/linux/io/done/r8a77961-test-CAN.yaml b/projects/linux/io/done/r8a77961-test-CAN.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..680d641
--- /dev/null
+++ b/projects/linux/io/done/r8a77961-test-CAN.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+title: "test CAN on r8a77961"
+team: IO
+assignee: Shimoda
+key: 2c4abf80-6c59-11eb-9bc6-1bdf5f639eec
+status: Done
+
+upstream:
+  - next: 92c406ed0a7f2810c4498e2b6bea81c6b61c03e8 # arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77961: Add CAN nodes
+  - next: cfa00070a1a82fce8c0ad3327fad1f182d4c691f # dt-bindings: net: can: rcar_can: Document r8a77961 support
+
+comments:
+  - "we didn't have HW so far"
+  - "Shimoda-san will create patches and let Goda-san test them using a KingFisher board"
+  - "v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=446887&state=*"
+  - "v3: https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg417099.html (surprisingly not in the renesas-soc patchwork?)"
+  - "merged"