summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/radeon
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>2012-09-05 18:44:45 +0200
committerMichel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>2012-09-06 15:25:13 +0200
commitb925022a3e4616665b388a78abab4e3270b4b4ec (patch)
tree0991f43f60aadbfe30bab1bfb8604f7073546ea5 /radeon
parent45083e6d36125c64267c917da3d81e1e144ed33d (diff)
radeon: Sampling pitch for non-mipmaps seems padded to slice alignment on SI.
Another corner case that isn't well-explained yet. Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'radeon')
-rw-r--r--radeon/radeon_surface.c11
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/radeon/radeon_surface.c b/radeon/radeon_surface.c
index 98faa0b9..80b15056 100644
--- a/radeon/radeon_surface.c
+++ b/radeon/radeon_surface.c
@@ -974,10 +974,15 @@ static void si_surf_minify_linear_aligned(struct radeon_surface *surf,
surf->level[level].nblk_z = (surf->level[level].npix_z + surf->blk_d - 1) / surf->blk_d;
}
- /* XXX: Second smallest level uses larger pitch, not sure of the real reason,
- * my best guess so far: rows evenly distributed across slice
+ /* XXX: Texture sampling uses unexpectedly large pitches in some cases,
+ * these are just guesses for the rules behind those
*/
- xalign = MAX2(xalign, slice_align / surf->bpe / surf->level[level].npix_y);
+ if (level == 0 && surf->last_level == 0)
+ /* Non-mipmap pitch padded to slice alignment */
+ xalign = MAX2(xalign, slice_align / surf->bpe);
+ else
+ /* Small rows evenly distributed across slice */
+ xalign = MAX2(xalign, slice_align / surf->bpe / surf->level[level].npix_y);
surf->level[level].nblk_x = ALIGN(surf->level[level].nblk_x, xalign);
surf->level[level].nblk_y = ALIGN(surf->level[level].nblk_y, yalign);