summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bsd-core/drm_dma.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMaarten Maathuis <madman2003@gmail.com>2008-06-26 21:28:29 +0200
committerMaarten Maathuis <madman2003@gmail.com>2008-06-26 21:28:29 +0200
commit13943fe5823c45759091c1a1f487a4abe377421e (patch)
tree81f26a67324de86703e1a9c8e825ad01337884a8 /bsd-core/drm_dma.c
parent4d85d5d25116304e476849ee64c206ffb3a7f372 (diff)
modesetting-101: Make dpms property optional + misc cleanup.
- intel_crt seems the only one to provide it, so init it there.
Diffstat (limited to 'bsd-core/drm_dma.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-05 15:34:57 +0000
97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 
Multimedia-chat-meeting-2019-10-10

10:18 < pinchartl> welcome to the multimedia meeting
10:18 < pinchartl> Topic 1. Status Check for the Multimedia Tasks
10:18 < pinchartl> * Jacopo
10:18 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:18 < pinchartl> - Restarted work on CMM
10:18 < pinchartl> Ezequiel (Collabora) is developing a very similar feature for Rockchip,
10:18 < pinchartl> and Sean's review on his patches will be taken into account for CMM.
10:18 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: N/A
10:18 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None
10:18 < pinchartl> jmondi: any comment ?
10:19 < jmondi> pinchartl: yes, quick one
10:19 < jmondi> Ezequiel has moved all their gamma LUT handing to atomic_enable/begin
10:20 < jmondi> Sean suggested that, and that removes the need to restore the color_management_changed flag after suspend as we do now
10:20 < jmondi> I plan to do the same for CMM, but before going down that path I would like your opinion there
10:20 < pinchartl> that seems wrong, the gamma LUT should be modifyable at runtime
10:20 < jmondi> [PATCH v4 0/3] RK3288 Gamma LUT
10:20 < pinchartl> why did they do that ?
10:21 < jmondi> I'm not sure I did completely understood Sean's reply to v3
10:21 < jmondi> I asked eze too yesterday, but then I had to run
10:21 < pinchartl> could you check it with them ? please raise the issue of modifying the gamma table at runtime
10:22 < jmondi> also, they moved everything to crct_enable/begin, while we had that in the commit_tail helper
10:22 < jmondi> so the CMM would be set per-CRTC ?
10:22 < pinchartl> to determine if it has to be supported (and if not, why, and where that is documented)
10:22 < jmondi> I will keep pressing Ezequiel on that
10:22 < jmondi> it's fun how many corner cases we're hitting with CMM
10:22 < jmondi> well, fun..
10:23 < pinchartl> it doesn't matter if it's set in the atomic tail handler or the CRTC operations, that's not relevant
10:23 < pinchartl> what is relevant is if modifying the gamma LUT without a modeset needs to be supported
10:23 < jmondi> ah well, no
10:23 < jmondi> we do
10:23 < jmondi> for_each_old_crtc_in_state
10:24 < jmondi> so we go through each crtc anyhow
10:24 < pinchartl> sure, we have to as gamma tables are per CRTC
10:24 < jmondi> indeed, my bad, I got confused
10:25 < jmondi> I'll try to know more
10:25 < pinchartl> so please check with them before changing anything, and please let me know
10:25 < pinchartl> thank you
10:25 < jmondi> you'll be cc-ed
10:26 < pinchartl> ok. I don't plan to participate in the discussion though, please make sure to drive it
10:26 < pinchartl> next, Kieran, who is AWOL due to having a new baby
10:27 < pinchartl> (what wouldn't people do to have a few weeks of off ? :-))
10:27 < pinchartl> * Laurent
10:27 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:27 < pinchartl> - CMM & other patches review
10:27 < pinchartl> - Attended XDC (X.Org Developer's Conference)
10:27 < pinchartl> Discussed, among other topics, a new kernel API for cameras,
10:27 < pinchartl> interoperability between displays and cameras, fences for V4L2, buffer
10:27 < pinchartl> allocator API with constraint resolution, ...
10:27 < pinchartl> Until next meeting:
10:27 < pinchartl> - CMM review to finish the upstreaming
10:27 < pinchartl> - DU group refactoring
10:27 < pinchartl> - Attending ELC-E (with V4L2 workshop)
10:27 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None
10:27 < pinchartl> any question ?
10:27 < pinchartl> * Morimoto-san
10:27 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:27 < pinchartl> - ALSA SoC framework cleanup
10:27 < pinchartl> Posted patches have been accepted, posted next set.
10:27 < pinchartl> - ALSA SoC small bug fixes
10:27 < pinchartl> Until next meeting:
10:27 < pinchartl> - Continue progressing cleanup patches
10:27 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers:
10:27 < pinchartl> - Can't test Intel-related changes
10:27 < pinchartl> Some of the cleanup patches are related to an Intel-specific features.
10:27 < pinchartl> The code is compile-tested only due to lack of a test platform.
10:27 < pinchartl> - Large number of cleanup patches to upstream
10:27 < pinchartl> ALSA SoC is too complex today, hence the need for a large cleanup, with
10:27 < pinchartl> more than 500 local patches still pending. The next step will focus on
10:27 < pinchartl> soc-pcm that supports flexible CPU/codec connections, and this area is
10:27 < pinchartl> too complex.
10:27 < pinchartl> morimoto: any comment ?
10:28 < morimoto> Intel said that they are using Github to test hardware
10:28 < morimoto> He can test it
10:29 < pinchartl> ? how does that work ?
10:29 < morimoto> I'm not sure detail, but if he push patches to Github,
10:29 < morimoto> test script (?) works automatically
10:30 < morimoto> Some magical machine is working
10:30 < pinchartl> I would have assumed them to use gitlab for self-hosted CI integration
10:30 < morimoto> And it seems my patches were OK
10:30 < pinchartl> that's good news :-)
10:30 < pinchartl> so it's not an issue anymore ?
10:30 < morimoto> yes :)
10:30 < morimoto> Yeah, thanks
10:31 < pinchartl> thank you
10:32  * pinchartl wonders if ALSA SoC cleanup is Morimoto-san's secret plan to boost his kernel commits statistics ;-)
10:32 < pinchartl> * Niklas
10:32 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:32 < pinchartl> - [PATCH 0/2] rcar-vin: Cleanup how subdevice format is handled
10:32 < pinchartl> - [PATCH v2 0/2] rcar-vin: Support V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_{TB,BT}
10:32 < pinchartl> - Attended LPC
10:32 < pinchartl> Until next meeting:
10:32 < pinchartl> - Attend ELC-E and join the V4L2 workshop
10:32 < pinchartl> - Keep pushing VIN patches unlocked by recent acceptance of cleanup patches
10:32 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None
10:32 < pinchartl> neg: any comment ?
10:32 < neg> No comment, thanks
10:33 < morimoto> pinchartl: not *secret* but *official* plan :)
10:33 < pinchartl> :-)
10:33 < pinchartl> * Ulrich
10:33 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:33 < pinchartl> - Patch review
10:33 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: N/A
10:33 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None
10:33 < pinchartl> uli_: any comment ?
10:33 < uli_> nope
10:34 < pinchartl> thank you
10:34 < pinchartl> any discussion topic ?
10:35 < neg> Anything to plan/bring to ELC-E ?
10:35 < wsa> I could bring my Gen2 Alt board for Kieran if he still needs that?
10:36 < neg> I'm thinking if we need some face-to-face talks or exchange of hardware. I take it we will not have a periperi meeting day ?
10:36 < pinchartl> wsa: could you check with him ?
10:36 < pinchartl> kbingham[m]: ^^
10:36 < geertu> wsa: kbhingham won't be there
10:36 < pinchartl> geertu: of course. stupid me
10:36 < wsa> right
10:36 < pinchartl> Kieran can't get the hardware if doesn't attend
10:36 < geertu> and the goods may receive increased scrutiny at border control
10:36 < pinchartl> neg: that was my next question. when will the next meeting be ?
10:37 < pinchartl> 3 weeks from now is October the 31st
10:37 < pinchartl> it will collide with the gstreamer conference for Jacopo and me
10:37 < wsa> that's elce time
10:37 < pinchartl> and I believe Niklas won't be back home yet either
10:38 < neg> I will go back home on the 3rd of Nov
10:38 < pinchartl> should we push it back by one week ?
10:38 < wsa> yup
10:38 < pinchartl> so November 7th, same time as usual ?
10:38 < wsa> works for me
10:38 < pinchartl> we will have switched to winter time
10:39 < geertu> pinchartl: Will we? ;)
10:39 < pinchartl> won't we ?
10:39 < morimoto> not in Japan :)
10:39 < geertu> Seems like the killing of DST has been moved to the background noise...
10:40 < pinchartl> geertu: I think we would have been notified if there would be no chance this autumn
10:41 < geertu> pinchartl: Right. So ELC-E will be held in Winter Time
10:42 < geertu> I hope Thalys knows ;-)
10:42 < pinchartl> so the meeting will start at 17:00 JST, right ?
10:42 < geertu> I think so
10:43 < pinchartl> ok
10:43 < pinchartl> that's all for the multimedia meeting
10:43 < pinchartl> I propose adjourning, does anyone second ?
10:43 < neg> second
10:44 < pinchartl> meeting adjourned. thank you all for attending
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-05 15:34:57 +0000