Multimedia-chat-meeting-2019-06-18

10:15 < pinchartl> welcome to the multimedia meeting
10:15 < pinchartl> Topic 1. Status Check for the Multimedia Tasks
10:15 < pinchartl> * Jacopo
10:15 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:15 < pinchartl> - CMM: Sent v1 after the 'plumbing' RFC patches
10:15 < pinchartl> - Face to face Meeting with Sakari Ailus
10:15 < pinchartl> Met with Sakari in Milan to discuss how to move forward with V4L2
10:15 < pinchartl> multiplexed streams. I presented him the restriction specific to Renesas
10:15 < pinchartl> devices. The series is currently stalled due to on-going discussion with
10:15 < pinchartl> Laurent and Niklas and  relatively low feedback from the rest of the
10:15 < pinchartl> V4L2 community.
10:15 < pinchartl> - Patch review
10:15 < pinchartl> Until next meeting:
10:15 < pinchartl> - Send next version of the CMM series
10:15 < pinchartl> Hope to meet the deadline for the v5.3 merge window (or is it late
10:15 < pinchartl> already?)
10:15 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers:
10:15 < pinchartl> - Consensus is hard to reach on v4l2-mux, stalling the work
10:15 < pinchartl> jmondi: any comment ?
10:16 < jmondi> I'm late for 5.3, rigth?
10:17 < pinchartl> I think the last chance would be tomorrow
10:17 < jmondi> ah
10:17 < jmondi> I don't think I could get your review on CMM for tomorrow, right?
10:17 < pinchartl> but there's no guarantee
10:17 < pinchartl> not unless you post the patches :-)
10:17 < jmondi> which assumes I should be able to resend today, which might not be impossible
10:18 < pinchartl> and one more version may be needed
10:18 < jmondi> ah you don't review not-posted patches? How lazy from you
10:18 < jmondi> indeed it might
10:18 < jmondi> pinchartl: should we try 5.3 or consider it late already?
10:18 < pinchartl> so there's no need to rush I think
10:19 < pinchartl> if you have spare cycles you can try, but it's getting late
10:19 < jmondi> a spare what?
10:19 < jmondi> :p
10:19 < pinchartl> :-)
10:19 < jmondi> I'll ping you if I'm able to resend today
10:19 < pinchartl> ok
10:19 < pinchartl> thank you
10:19 < pinchartl> * Kieran
10:19 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:19 < pinchartl> - More investigation on partition algorithm phase
10:19 < pinchartl> New 'datasheet' implementation is still 'off' by x pixels.
10:19 < pinchartl> - Supported Laurent with DU group rework
10:19 < pinchartl> - Reviewed the LVDS dual-link mode series
10:19 < pinchartl> Until next meeting:
10:19 < pinchartl> - Continue digging on PA-phase
10:19 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers:
10:19 < pinchartl> - 'new' PA Phase is generating partitions that are not aligned correctly
10:19 < pinchartl> The 'dumbed down' implementation works, but following the datasheet
10:19 < pinchartl> procedure does not. Still not sure if that's a bug in the
10:19 < pinchartl> implementation, of if the algorithm provided by the datasheet just isn't
10:19 < pinchartl> creating the correct alignments. Needs extensive debug.
10:19 < pinchartl> kbingham: any comment ?
10:20 < kbingham> yes - its' painful :) Because I have low visibility of what the hardware does except for a 'yes/no' it's worked or hasn't :S
10:21 < kbingham> Otherwise status is correct :)
10:21 < pinchartl> really ? don't we know quite well what the hardware does ?
10:21 < kbingham> Do we know which pixels are being processed exactly and why it's unaligned when I expect it not to be?
10:22 < pinchartl> I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to find it out
10:22 < pinchartl> you can create specially crafted images to see what pixels are processed
10:23 < kbingham> Ok - lets work on something to do that next. But we can discuss that offline from here.
10:23 < pinchartl> ok
10:23 < pinchartl> thanks
10:23 < pinchartl> * Laurent
10:23 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:23 < pinchartl> - Got the LVDS dual-link prototype merged
10:23 < pinchartl> - Posted next version of DU group refactoring
10:23 < pinchartl> - Patch review
10:23 < pinchartl> Until next meeting:
10:23 < pinchartl> - Get DU group refactoring merged
10:23 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None
10:23 < pinchartl> any question ?
10:25 < pinchartl> * Morimoto-san
10:25 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:25 < pinchartl> - ALSA SoC modern device support
10:25 < pinchartl> Patches were posted and accepted.
10:25 < pinchartl> Until next meeting:
10:25 < pinchartl> - Post ALSA SoC framework cleanup
10:25 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None
10:25 < pinchartl> morimoto: any comment ?
10:25 < morimoto> thanks. no comment
10:25 < pinchartl> thank you
10:25 < pinchartl> * Niklas
10:25 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:25 < pinchartl> - First big VIN series accepted upstream
10:25 < pinchartl> - Add support for RGBA formats to VIN
10:25 < pinchartl> Until next meeting:
10:25 < pinchartl> - Keep cleaning up the VIN crop and compose code
10:25 < pinchartl> This is needed to merge UDS and PM support.
10:25 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None
10:25 < pinchartl> neg: any comment ?
10:26 < neg> no comment
10:26 < pinchartl> thank you
10:26 < pinchartl> * Simon + Kaneko-san
10:26 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:26 < pinchartl> - Add CPG reset to DU node in D3/E3 DT
10:26 < pinchartl> - Fix register range for DU in D3/E3 DT
10:26 < pinchartl> Until next meeting:
10:26 < pinchartl> - Update BSP ticket file
10:26 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None
10:26 < pinchartl> horms: any comment ?
10:27 < horms> Nothing more to add
10:27 < pinchartl> thank you
10:27 < pinchartl> * Ulrich
10:27 < pinchartl> Since last meeting:
10:27 < pinchartl> - Patch review
10:27 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: None
10:27 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None
10:27 < pinchartl> uli__: any comment ?
10:27 < uli__> nope
10:27 < pinchartl> thank you
10:27 < pinchartl> that's it for status updates
10:27 < pinchartl> any discussion topic ?
10:29 < pinchartl> if not, I propose adjourning this meeting. does anyone second ?
10:29 < neg> second
10:29 < morimoto> 2nd
10:29 < pinchartl> meeting adjourned, thank you for attending