09:04 < wsa> welcome to today's IO meeting 09:04 < wsa> status reports: 09:04 < wsa> Status updates 09:04 < wsa> ============== 09:04 < wsa> A - what have I done since last time 09:04 < wsa> ------------------------------------ 09:04 < wsa> Geert 09:04 < wsa> : tested at25 spimem conversion, replaced spi_master by spi_controller in 09:04 < wsa> various SPI drivers, and preliminary testing of SCIF5 DMA on R-Car E3 09:04 < wsa> Marek 09:04 < wsa> : worked on various SDHI issues in U-Boot, upported eMMC reset patch for SDHI, 09:04 < wsa> got thermal patch which adds hwmon interfaces merged 09:04 < wsa> Shimoda-san 09:04 < wsa> : 09:04 < wsa> Simon 09:04 < wsa> : posted fix for AVB phy-mode on Draak, needs testing 09:04 < wsa> Wolfram 09:04 < wsa> : implemented a fault injector to simulate 'arbitration lost' without having a 09:04 < wsa> multi-master setup, implemented a fault injector which panics during a 09:04 < wsa> transfer so rebooting with an inconsistent bus state can be tested, converted 09:04 < wsa> Gen2/3 IIC to use a better formula to calc the freqs, upported SDHI patch for 09:04 < wsa> HW adjustment depending on speed mode, reviewed a few I2C and SDHI patches, 09:04 < wsa> converted and pushed first periject data, sent my first glibc patch 09:04 < wsa> B - what I want to do until next time 09:04 < wsa> ------------------------------------- 09:04 < wsa> Geert 09:04 < wsa> : wants to do more testing of SCIF5 DMA on R-Car E3 09:04 < wsa> Kaneko-san 09:04 < wsa> : wants to pport temperature calculation fixes for R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2 SoCs 09:04 < wsa> Niklas 09:04 < wsa> : wants to nbox APE6EVM and make sure it boots and hopefully have a first look 09:04 < wsa> at the MMC PM imbalance issue 09:04 < wsa> Shimoda-san 09:04 < wsa> : wants to 09:04 < wsa> Simon 09:04 < wsa> : wants to asses RAVB patches in BSP v3.9.2, measure MMC performance across 09:04 < wsa> various Gen3 boards 09:04 < wsa> Wolfram 09:04 < wsa> : wants to upport I2C patches, continue working on atomic I2C transfers, assist 09:04 < wsa> with whatever topics JapaPERI brings to the table 09:04 < wsa> C - problems I currently have 09:04 < wsa> ----------------------------- 09:04 < wsa> None reported 09:05 < wsa> I am still waiting for Shimoda-san's report, I guess it will come along... 09:05 < wsa> I dropped all "meetings in BE" items because for me the reports should have been since the meetings in BE :) 09:06 < wsa> geertu: any plans for the MSIOF patches in bsp392? 09:06 < wsa> Marex: wasn't there also PCIe link handling in ATF as B)? 09:07 < Marex> PCI link handling in ATF is in submitted PR 09:07 < wsa> neg: can we drop the "hopefully" from the SDHI clk imbalance thing? 09:07 < Marex> since a few hours ago 09:07 < wsa> Marex: cool! 09:07 < Marex> (before I went to bed) 09:08 < wsa> uli___: dunno if you maybe did it already, but could you test the D3 phy patch that Simon mentioned in his report? 09:08 < neg> wsa: Depends on how confident you are that the APE6EVM works :-) Magnus warned me its status is unkown. But yes please remover it form the report 09:08 < uli___> wsa: can do 09:08 < wsa> uli___: thx 09:08 < geertu> wsa: Is there anything non-controversial w.r.t. MSIOF left? 09:09 < wsa> neg: ah, "hopefully" means "if the board works" and not "if I have time"? 09:09 < wsa> geertu: if it is controversial, please add comments to the ticket file, so I know 09:09 < neg> wsa: Yes 09:10 < wsa> neg: ah, good, I misunderstood this. Let me know how the board is doing :) 09:10 < neg> Will do, plan is to try it on Monday 09:11 < wsa> sounds good 09:12 < wsa> what is so special about SCIF5 DMA on Ebisu, BTW? 09:13 < geertu> The DMA documentation about it was wrong, so DT was wrong, too 09:14 < wsa> I see 09:14 < wsa> any questions from your side? 09:15 < geertu> I sort of verified the new one is OK, but am now looking for CP45 on the board, to connect a probe ;-) 09:15 < wsa> oh, we are on that level :) 09:16 < wsa> neg: do you still have that SDIO WIFI card or did you give it to JapaPERI? 09:16 < neg> I still have it 09:17 < neg> I try it from time to time tracking progress in the thread 'Test of EVK-EMMY-W161-A on Koelsch with SDR50 and SDR104' ;-) 09:18 < wsa> can you just check if it works with SDR104 for you? When testing Sergei's patch, I had to reduce it to SDR50 to make it probe :( 09:18 < Marex> geertu: I wonder what else is wrong on E3 Ebisu ... maybe the SDHI performance ? 09:18 < wsa> My test was on M3N 09:19 < geertu> Marex: Have you looked into the meaning of the values written to the QoS registers? 09:20 < neg> wsa: to be clear SDIO + M3N + '[PATCH v3] mmc: tmio_mmc_core: don't claim spurious interrupts' right? 09:21 < Marex> geertu: is there any documentation besides "QoS Level x Threshold y Setting" ? 09:21 < Marex> geertu: besides, we do not know whether it is QoS problem at all 09:21 < wsa> neg: yes. but other Gen3 boards are interesting, too 09:22 < wsa> neg: and the probing should really be independent of Sergei's patch 09:22 < neg> wsa: OK will do 09:22 < wsa> thx! 09:23 < geertu> Marex: From a quick glance, I already read things like "1.95 usec not supported on E3", so it uses 7.80 intead 09:24 < Marex> geertu: both work, changing that doesn't help 09:24 < Marex> geertu: and I think it was using 3.9 , not 7.8 09:25 < Marex> geertu: IIRC you can select either or with a MD switch 09:25 < geertu> ok 09:25 < neg> wsa: for reference did you test on top of mmc/fixes or mmc/next ? 09:25 < Marex> and if not, rebuild ATF for either or ... nonetheless, doesn't help 09:26 < Marex> either the SDHI is somehow underclock, or the bus somewhere between SDHI and DRAM is too narrow , or there's DRAM bottleneck 09:27 < wsa> neg: hmmm, either mmc/next or v5.0-rcX. Need to look this up, code is on another machine... 09:27 < Marex> DRAM bottleneck is unlikely, I did memtester and calculations, it gives more then plenty of bandwidth ... way more than 400 MB/s 09:27 < Marex> s/memtester/lmbench/ 09:27 < neg> wsa: OK no worries I figure it out 09:28 < wsa> shall we move to core meeting then? 09:29 < wsa> looks like it 09:29 < wsa> geertu: the stage is yours 09:29 < wsa> thanks for this meeting!