From 55e3b2f45880faaf06f3c660ca9e8a6d9aa14bce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kuninori Morimoto Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:29:52 +0900 Subject: wiki: Porting wiki: Porting Chat Log Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- wiki/Chat_log/20191010-mm-chatlog | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 144 insertions(+) create mode 100644 wiki/Chat_log/20191010-mm-chatlog (limited to 'wiki/Chat_log/20191010-mm-chatlog') diff --git a/wiki/Chat_log/20191010-mm-chatlog b/wiki/Chat_log/20191010-mm-chatlog new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d14fd99 --- /dev/null +++ b/wiki/Chat_log/20191010-mm-chatlog @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ +Multimedia-chat-meeting-2019-10-10 + +10:18 < pinchartl> welcome to the multimedia meeting +10:18 < pinchartl> Topic 1. Status Check for the Multimedia Tasks +10:18 < pinchartl> * Jacopo +10:18 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:18 < pinchartl> - Restarted work on CMM +10:18 < pinchartl> Ezequiel (Collabora) is developing a very similar feature for Rockchip, +10:18 < pinchartl> and Sean's review on his patches will be taken into account for CMM. +10:18 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: N/A +10:18 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None +10:18 < pinchartl> jmondi: any comment ? +10:19 < jmondi> pinchartl: yes, quick one +10:19 < jmondi> Ezequiel has moved all their gamma LUT handing to atomic_enable/begin +10:20 < jmondi> Sean suggested that, and that removes the need to restore the color_management_changed flag after suspend as we do now +10:20 < jmondi> I plan to do the same for CMM, but before going down that path I would like your opinion there +10:20 < pinchartl> that seems wrong, the gamma LUT should be modifyable at runtime +10:20 < jmondi> [PATCH v4 0/3] RK3288 Gamma LUT +10:20 < pinchartl> why did they do that ? +10:21 < jmondi> I'm not sure I did completely understood Sean's reply to v3 +10:21 < jmondi> I asked eze too yesterday, but then I had to run +10:21 < pinchartl> could you check it with them ? please raise the issue of modifying the gamma table at runtime +10:22 < jmondi> also, they moved everything to crct_enable/begin, while we had that in the commit_tail helper +10:22 < jmondi> so the CMM would be set per-CRTC ? +10:22 < pinchartl> to determine if it has to be supported (and if not, why, and where that is documented) +10:22 < jmondi> I will keep pressing Ezequiel on that +10:22 < jmondi> it's fun how many corner cases we're hitting with CMM +10:22 < jmondi> well, fun.. +10:23 < pinchartl> it doesn't matter if it's set in the atomic tail handler or the CRTC operations, that's not relevant +10:23 < pinchartl> what is relevant is if modifying the gamma LUT without a modeset needs to be supported +10:23 < jmondi> ah well, no +10:23 < jmondi> we do +10:23 < jmondi> for_each_old_crtc_in_state +10:24 < jmondi> so we go through each crtc anyhow +10:24 < pinchartl> sure, we have to as gamma tables are per CRTC +10:24 < jmondi> indeed, my bad, I got confused +10:25 < jmondi> I'll try to know more +10:25 < pinchartl> so please check with them before changing anything, and please let me know +10:25 < pinchartl> thank you +10:25 < jmondi> you'll be cc-ed +10:26 < pinchartl> ok. I don't plan to participate in the discussion though, please make sure to drive it +10:26 < pinchartl> next, Kieran, who is AWOL due to having a new baby +10:27 < pinchartl> (what wouldn't people do to have a few weeks of off ? :-)) +10:27 < pinchartl> * Laurent +10:27 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:27 < pinchartl> - CMM & other patches review +10:27 < pinchartl> - Attended XDC (X.Org Developer's Conference) +10:27 < pinchartl> Discussed, among other topics, a new kernel API for cameras, +10:27 < pinchartl> interoperability between displays and cameras, fences for V4L2, buffer +10:27 < pinchartl> allocator API with constraint resolution, ... +10:27 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:27 < pinchartl> - CMM review to finish the upstreaming +10:27 < pinchartl> - DU group refactoring +10:27 < pinchartl> - Attending ELC-E (with V4L2 workshop) +10:27 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None +10:27 < pinchartl> any question ? +10:27 < pinchartl> * Morimoto-san +10:27 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:27 < pinchartl> - ALSA SoC framework cleanup +10:27 < pinchartl> Posted patches have been accepted, posted next set. +10:27 < pinchartl> - ALSA SoC small bug fixes +10:27 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:27 < pinchartl> - Continue progressing cleanup patches +10:27 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: +10:27 < pinchartl> - Can't test Intel-related changes +10:27 < pinchartl> Some of the cleanup patches are related to an Intel-specific features. +10:27 < pinchartl> The code is compile-tested only due to lack of a test platform. +10:27 < pinchartl> - Large number of cleanup patches to upstream +10:27 < pinchartl> ALSA SoC is too complex today, hence the need for a large cleanup, with +10:27 < pinchartl> more than 500 local patches still pending. The next step will focus on +10:27 < pinchartl> soc-pcm that supports flexible CPU/codec connections, and this area is +10:27 < pinchartl> too complex. +10:27 < pinchartl> morimoto: any comment ? +10:28 < morimoto> Intel said that they are using Github to test hardware +10:28 < morimoto> He can test it +10:29 < pinchartl> ? how does that work ? +10:29 < morimoto> I'm not sure detail, but if he push patches to Github, +10:29 < morimoto> test script (?) works automatically +10:30 < morimoto> Some magical machine is working +10:30 < pinchartl> I would have assumed them to use gitlab for self-hosted CI integration +10:30 < morimoto> And it seems my patches were OK +10:30 < pinchartl> that's good news :-) +10:30 < pinchartl> so it's not an issue anymore ? +10:30 < morimoto> yes :) +10:30 < morimoto> Yeah, thanks +10:31 < pinchartl> thank you +10:32 * pinchartl wonders if ALSA SoC cleanup is Morimoto-san's secret plan to boost his kernel commits statistics ;-) +10:32 < pinchartl> * Niklas +10:32 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:32 < pinchartl> - [PATCH 0/2] rcar-vin: Cleanup how subdevice format is handled +10:32 < pinchartl> - [PATCH v2 0/2] rcar-vin: Support V4L2_FIELD_SEQ_{TB,BT} +10:32 < pinchartl> - Attended LPC +10:32 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: +10:32 < pinchartl> - Attend ELC-E and join the V4L2 workshop +10:32 < pinchartl> - Keep pushing VIN patches unlocked by recent acceptance of cleanup patches +10:32 < pinchartl> Issues and blockers: None +10:32 < pinchartl> neg: any comment ? +10:32 < neg> No comment, thanks +10:33 < morimoto> pinchartl: not *secret* but *official* plan :) +10:33 < pinchartl> :-) +10:33 < pinchartl> * Ulrich +10:33 < pinchartl> Since last meeting: +10:33 < pinchartl> - Patch review +10:33 < pinchartl> Until next meeting: N/A +10:33 < pinchartl> Issues and Blockers: None +10:33 < pinchartl> uli_: any comment ? +10:33 < uli_> nope +10:34 < pinchartl> thank you +10:34 < pinchartl> any discussion topic ? +10:35 < neg> Anything to plan/bring to ELC-E ? +10:35 < wsa> I could bring my Gen2 Alt board for Kieran if he still needs that? +10:36 < neg> I'm thinking if we need some face-to-face talks or exchange of hardware. I take it we will not have a periperi meeting day ? +10:36 < pinchartl> wsa: could you check with him ? +10:36 < pinchartl> kbingham[m]: ^^ +10:36 < geertu> wsa: kbhingham won't be there +10:36 < pinchartl> geertu: of course. stupid me +10:36 < wsa> right +10:36 < pinchartl> Kieran can't get the hardware if doesn't attend +10:36 < geertu> and the goods may receive increased scrutiny at border control +10:36 < pinchartl> neg: that was my next question. when will the next meeting be ? +10:37 < pinchartl> 3 weeks from now is October the 31st +10:37 < pinchartl> it will collide with the gstreamer conference for Jacopo and me +10:37 < wsa> that's elce time +10:37 < pinchartl> and I believe Niklas won't be back home yet either +10:38 < neg> I will go back home on the 3rd of Nov +10:38 < pinchartl> should we push it back by one week ? +10:38 < wsa> yup +10:38 < pinchartl> so November 7th, same time as usual ? +10:38 < wsa> works for me +10:38 < pinchartl> we will have switched to winter time +10:39 < geertu> pinchartl: Will we? ;) +10:39 < pinchartl> won't we ? +10:39 < morimoto> not in Japan :) +10:39 < geertu> Seems like the killing of DST has been moved to the background noise... +10:40 < pinchartl> geertu: I think we would have been notified if there would be no chance this autumn +10:41 < geertu> pinchartl: Right. So ELC-E will be held in Winter Time +10:42 < geertu> I hope Thalys knows ;-) +10:42 < pinchartl> so the meeting will start at 17:00 JST, right ? +10:42 < geertu> I think so +10:43 < pinchartl> ok +10:43 < pinchartl> that's all for the multimedia meeting +10:43 < pinchartl> I propose adjourning, does anyone second ? +10:43 < neg> second +10:44 < pinchartl> meeting adjourned. thank you all for attending -- cgit v1.2.3