From d1187641d64f442968a3b9ea6a19de6cdd45acd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Keith Packard Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:16:50 -0800 Subject: Rename inappropriately named 'mask' fields to 'proposed_flags' instead. Flags pending validation were stored in a misleadingly named field, 'mask'. As 'mask' is already used to indicate pieces of a flags field which are changing, it seems better to use a name reflecting the actual purpose of this field. I chose 'proposed_flags' as they may not actually end up in 'flags', and in an case will be modified when they are moved over. This affects the API, but not ABI of the user-mode interface. --- linux-core/via_buffer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'linux-core/via_buffer.c') diff --git a/linux-core/via_buffer.c b/linux-core/via_buffer.c index ea755247..532fae6a 100644 --- a/linux-core/via_buffer.c +++ b/linux-core/via_buffer.c @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int via_init_mem_type(struct drm_device * dev, uint32_t type, return 0; } -uint32_t via_evict_mask(struct drm_buffer_object *bo) +uint64_t via_evict_flags(struct drm_buffer_object *bo) { switch (bo->mem.mem_type) { case DRM_BO_MEM_LOCAL: -- cgit v1.2.3