| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
NV04/NV10 load_context()/save_context() are stubs. I don't know enough about
how they work to implement them sanely. The "old" context_switch() code
remains hooked up, so it shouldn't break anything.
NV20 will probably break if load_context() works. No inital context values
are filled in, so when the first channel is created PGRAPH will probably end
up having its state zeroed. Some setup from nv20_graph_init() will probably
need to be moved to the per-channel context setup.
|
|
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=mesa/drm.git;a=commitdiff;h=17985f07d68322519919a7f629a6d2d9bf3916ed could have broken some nvxx_graph code : it rename NV03_PGRAPH_CTX_CONTROL to NV10_PGRAPH_CTX_CONTROL, but forgot to update it in nvxx_graph file.
Also when migrating init stuff in http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=mesa/drm.git;a=commitdiff;h=674cefd4fe4b537a20a10edcb4ec5df55facca8e, NV04_PGRAPH_CTX_CONTROL is used everywhere but the old ddx code use NV_PGRAPH_CTX_CONTROL_NV04 or NV_PGRAPH_CTX_CONTROL.
|
|
The PGRAPH init for the various cards will need cleaning up at some point,
a lot of the values written there are per-context state left over from the
all the hardcoding done in the ddx.
It's possible some cards get broken by this commit, let me know.
Tested on: NV5, NV18, NV28, NV35, NV40, NV4E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Untested...
|
