Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The overflow checks were all thoroughly untested, and a bunch of the
ones I'm deleting were pretty broken. Now, in the case of overflow,
you just decode data of 0xd0d0d0d0, and instr_out prints the warning
message instead. Note that this still has the same issue of being
under-tested, but at least it's one place instead of per-packet.
A couple of BUFFER_FAIL uses are left where the length to be decoded
could be (significantly) larger than a page, and the decode didn't
just call instr_out (which doesn't dereference data itself unless it's
safe).
|
|
This reduces some of the extra derefs of the pointers.
|
|
Similar to BR00, count was always 1 and was always an index, not a count.
|
|
The count (actually index) was always 0, because BR00 is dword 0.
|
|
We still deref the context at the start of every call, but that will
change next.
|
|
Nothing was consuming it. If something wants this in the future,
would be done using the decode context anyway.
|
|
This is the start of plumbing the context through the decode
callchain instead of the current 4 arguments.
|
|
Consumers often want to choose stdout vs stderr, and for testing I
want to output to an open_memstream file.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Chad Versace <chad.versace@linux.intel.com>
|
|
It was producing an unused code warning. I'm tempted to just remove
it, since it's unused, but I *might* use it soon.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
|
|
I'd rather be able to use c99 variable declarations (there's a lot of
awful code layout due to being c90ish), but I'll leave that for later.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
|
|
There was plenty of dropped useful data, and some horribly
mis-formatted data.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
|
|
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
|
|
We've got a different (better) set of warning flags in place in this
tree.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
|
|
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
|
|
My plan is to use this drm_intel_dump_batchbuffer() interface for the
current GPU tools, and the current Mesa batch dumping usage, while
eventually building more interesting interfaces for other uses.
Warnings are currently suppressed by using a helper lib with CFLAGS
set manually, because the code is totally not ready for libdrm's warnings
setup.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
|
|
Some comments weren't wrapped, and for some reason uint32_t *data got
an extra space (while other instances of "type *identifier" didn't),
and the indentation of the opcode-list structs got trashed.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
|
|
We generally go for kernel style in this tree, and this 4-space indent
stuff was bothering me. The new results have some ugly bits, but
they're in places where we desperately want to be using helper
functions anyway.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
|
|
This is from commit dd9a5b4f7fb07c78db4e7481bedca1b981030e3f.
We've been sharing this file between that repo and Mesa, and it's time
to build a real interface using it. I'm also hoping to apply some of
its packet-walking logic for AUB dumping and batch validation
purposes.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
|