diff options
author | Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com> | 2012-09-05 18:44:45 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> | 2012-09-06 15:25:13 +0200 |
commit | b925022a3e4616665b388a78abab4e3270b4b4ec (patch) | |
tree | 0991f43f60aadbfe30bab1bfb8604f7073546ea5 | |
parent | 45083e6d36125c64267c917da3d81e1e144ed33d (diff) |
radeon: Sampling pitch for non-mipmaps seems padded to slice alignment on SI.
Another corner case that isn't well-explained yet.
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
-rw-r--r-- | radeon/radeon_surface.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/radeon/radeon_surface.c b/radeon/radeon_surface.c index 98faa0b9..80b15056 100644 --- a/radeon/radeon_surface.c +++ b/radeon/radeon_surface.c @@ -974,10 +974,15 @@ static void si_surf_minify_linear_aligned(struct radeon_surface *surf, surf->level[level].nblk_z = (surf->level[level].npix_z + surf->blk_d - 1) / surf->blk_d; } - /* XXX: Second smallest level uses larger pitch, not sure of the real reason, - * my best guess so far: rows evenly distributed across slice + /* XXX: Texture sampling uses unexpectedly large pitches in some cases, + * these are just guesses for the rules behind those */ - xalign = MAX2(xalign, slice_align / surf->bpe / surf->level[level].npix_y); + if (level == 0 && surf->last_level == 0) + /* Non-mipmap pitch padded to slice alignment */ + xalign = MAX2(xalign, slice_align / surf->bpe); + else + /* Small rows evenly distributed across slice */ + xalign = MAX2(xalign, slice_align / surf->bpe / surf->level[level].npix_y); surf->level[level].nblk_x = ALIGN(surf->level[level].nblk_x, xalign); surf->level[level].nblk_y = ALIGN(surf->level[level].nblk_y, yalign); |